Saturday, August 13, 2005

planetarion- simulating politics

in the true spirit of computer gaming i thought id cue u guys in on a little game i played in high school called planetarion. it was free back then, and now has an entry fee to be paid by dredit card. the site is www.planetarion.com
basically when u sign up you can either be placed into a designated galaxy or a random one. you are the 'ruler' of a planet, and you have resources from which to build your empire. within your galaxy you must collectively vote in a prime minister, a vice, and ministers of war, finance and communications. with your resources, you can invest in defence, offence, technology or more resources, to be simplistic.
what makes this unique, as opposed to the large variety of role playing games available on the net, is that it deals with numbers and text, without any animation, and maintains a high level of anonymity, with only your planet and ruler name as an alias. you log on, decide to build ships, research tech, harvest asteroids for resources, and then contribute to the galactic forum. from time to time you can choose to attack someone, in the hopes of assimilating their resources and attaining a higher score. i could go on about the games inner workings but thats beside the point. id suggest having a look and then coming back to this. basicallythe ultimate goal is to build up a huge army and dominate the universe.
performed as a social experiment, this would certainly give a lot of insight into the way we choose to manage ourselves, be it capitalist, communist, anarchy, whatever.
just think about it- a random collection of strangers, forced to cooperate for the benefit of them and those nearest to them. politics idealised, i suppose, as i personally have witnessed the ministers of finance doling out the galactic funds to finance their coup de tat.
the appeal for me, i guess, as i entered into a galaxy with friends and the 'cooler' elite of my year, was the chance to erase my previous profile and become an arbitrary equal.
through the looking glass, playing the numbers game, its seems obvious why someone would want to attack someone with a low ships:asteroid ratio. if youve got a bigger army then him, and hes got asteroids that you want, freakin take them. the only people that matter are the ones in your own galaxy, and they wont do anything because youve got the most ships and happen to be the prime minister. of course we're allowed to be shamelessly greedy, its only a computer game, right? there arent real people in those ships. has anyone read the book enders game?
here we start to find the ethical dillemma apparent in the very core of computer gaming-simulation. truth without consequence.
to end with another planetarion anecdote- when i was playing, my friends had a party one night and managed to crack the password of our prime minister, who also had the highest score. i saw him every day in my english class, but i never really talked to him. anyway- we sent his entirefleet to attack the strongest planet in the universe and he was completely annihilated, particularly with the counterstrike. he threatened to beat me up and i kept my distance from him for quite a while. i guess these things have consequences after all. anonymity's dark side is most definitely a lack of empathy

marc t

Does Pop-up ad really disturbing you?

When I tried to search “Pop-up Ads” on the Google search engine, there are 13,400,000 results are found. But most of the results are telling people where to download software such as spyware or Pop-up stopper to block the ads. The rest of the results show that Pop-up ad has been being a popular debate on the World Wide Web.

Pop-up ads are now being a form of online advertising for the advertisers to publish their ads through the medium of Internet. This type of ads, as everybody knows, they suddenly jump up as a new window in front of you by using Flash or DHTML format to draw the user’s attention. Some of the ads are very trickery and let people being curious; some of them are using animation to gain people’s attention; but most of them, are very annoying. Thus, the new Windows XP version inserts pop-up blocking in the Internet Explorer to please the users.

However, there are still an amount of people choose not to use the blocking of pop-up ads since they find the pop-up ads give them more information and save time for searching. Still, leaving them unblock is not a good idea. Once you unblock it, it will keep coming up and “hijacking” your personal time. Also, some of this type of ads contains virus that may harm your computer. They are like the junk mails in your mail box which are not much useful but hold space. For example, in the pornographic web sites, the associate links and adverting are not going to stop popping up. Under this circumstance, users can only close the browser to stop the popping.

At last, are you the one preventing the Pop-up ads or the one who welcome this type of advertising?

Old gamers never die

One interesting touch in the next James Bond game (“From Russia with Love” – GamerTV on Prime-2005-08-13) is that they are trying to recreate the sound of the film by having a new score written in the style of John Barry (original writer of the main theme) and getting it performed by the London Philharmonic – yes a real orchestra. I find this significant for two reasons. First, that a, presumably, very high tech game is perceived as needing real wood, brass, catgut and ivory instruments, second that the retro feel of the original is worth achieving. Real instruments suggests that people can tell the difference, the retro feel is an interesting introduction of nostalgia into the genre.

Are they trying to appeal to an older demographic or is it that younger players are bored with new stuff. If it is the former then I suspect the game will be retro all the way with clunky gadgets and an avoidance of technology that the original writers of the film (let alone the book) could not have known about like PDAs. If the latter, then it may have more a feel of a fantasy like some of the alternative history titles with multi-function cell phones etc.

My feeling is that they need more market and the grey dollar is getting very attractive: surplus income; lack of piracy culture and the fact that some medical “experts” are already suggesting that game playing can offset some effects of ageing (wonder who they're doing the research for). All together the old gamer who can suddenly leap buildings with a single bound could be a big part of the future of gaming. But then I would say that I'm one of them.

High-speed net & our appreciation of music

Being a music fan, downloading music (for free of course, ha) is something that's appealed to me for years now. I've been downloading mp3s since about 1998/9, but until recently I've had to put up with dial-up speeds. Downloading a 5mb song file at 5kb/s as most will know is a pain in the ass and so my mp3 collection was relatively small. Now though, my flatmate and I have upgraded to Xtra Jetstream (high-speed, broadband) and we thought we may as well go and get the fastest one (256kb/s), with the largest download limit (10gig). Our access to music now is bordering on the ridiculous. With knowledge of the right sites and things, it's not uncommon to download an entire album of music (about 80 megabytes) in 5-7 minutes. And since we have 10gigs to work worth, that means a lot of albums potentially (at least 100). This is where the problem begins though...

We'll download an entire album and while it's still finding its way on to the computer we've found another one and lined that up for download. So the first one finishes, and we start the second one downloading while we listen to the first one (it's not as confusing as that sentence, ha). Next, we skip through every track of the album and listen to about 30 seconds of each one. Then we go back to the ones that sounded good and give them a slightly more thorough listen. After that, we'll talk about how this track was shit, and that one was mean... and then... that's it. That album is basically finished with and we're ready to do the same with the one that has arrived in the meantime. Admittedly the songs I like will make it to my iPod, but the rest will be burned off to disc and forgotten about.

This is where I feel our appreciation of music is cheapened or lessened by the access high-speed internet provides to music.
I mean, previously my music listening habits were a lot more attentive and if I go back to the 1990's I would spend literally months on one album. I'd play it to death and in the process I'd learn all the words and pick up on what the artist was saying or trying to convey. Whereas now, unless it's a favourite artist of mine, I'll play the track and if the beat doesn't grab my attention within 30 seconds, I'll skip to the next one.

Also, back when I was about buying CDs, the price meant it was likely I'd only get one at a time and that's all the new music I would have until I could save up enough money for another one. Which meant I'd really play it out and make sure I got my moneys worth. Because you would spend more time with the album, you would learn to like new tracks eventually as well, and get a truer appreciation of the whole album... not just its lead singles and ear-catching tracks.

Anyone else know what I'm talking about?

Blurring the line between producer and consumer...

I thought that the following website was a really good example of how a traditional vehicle of information was being trasnsformed by virtue of the digital era. The site is: www.urbandictionary.com and it allows users to post definitions of words that you are very unlikely to find in the Collins Dictionary! So not only can you look up words, such as the many new phrases that gangsa rap has produced, but if you disagree with someone else's definition of a word you are able to challenge it and put forward your interpretation of the word or phrase. It is because of the possibility of such dialogue that I think is really innovative because on the whole I usually take what the "proper" dictionary has to say as gospel, whereas this give the user of term the powere to determine it's finer meaning.

There are definatley some pretty hilarious definitions, but it turns out to be a pretty useful tool for travellers. My sister has jsut moved to New York and is searching for an apartment. One of the ads specified that the guy hated "GWB" (George W Bush) and loved "NSC" which, after a search on "urban dictionary" turns out to be a fairly obscure independant newpaper.

Charlotte T

Trailer Crashers



Something light hearted for a saturday night.. stumbled across this when i was reading the latest edition of Empire, as part of the promotion for Wedding Crashers you can go on to their site and 'crash' their trailer, by uploading a digital image of yourself and inserting yourself into the trailer then watching it play back with your face on it. I just thought it was amusing, could just be the time of day though :p Heres the link.

And heres the one that i made:

Trailer

Friday, August 12, 2005

Videogame creators still searching for validity?

Hey all, just a semi-rant here.

After our lecture on gameplay I couldnt help but think that the videogame industry comes of as rather insecure. I remember at the launch of the Xbox game "Halo 2" the constant reminder at how much money it made, note the emphasis on "money" and not "units sold". Sure, Halo 2 made something like $US120 million (I think was the figure) but if we compare the units sold, to the number of "units", or people, that watch a comparable blockbuster film, i'm pretty sure we'd have a more accurate indicator/comparison. Lets not forget the fact that the average cost of a game in the USA is $US50, whereas a movie ticket is somewhere around the 8-12$ mark. This only made me think that it was the game industry desperatley searching for validation.

I know the fact that in the USA the gaming industry, as a whole, makes more money annually than the film industry, and while gaming is not considered a purely "geek" pastime i dont think it has achieved the sort of cultural cache that films have.

Hrmm, i dont think that i have made a point yet. Alright, how's this for one - game creators should let go of their insecurities and start to make some truly original games, instead of simply trying to make an 'interactive hollywood'. (something not set in World War 2 would be a nice start.)

This rant was inspired by something I read on www.grumpygamer.com a few months ago. Cant be bothered finding the exact article.

Team America - World Police

I recently watched "Team America", created by Southparks Matt Stone and Trey Parker. Originally thinking it wouldnt be my type of movie, i was surprisingly entertained.
In a nutshell, its essentially about a team of Americans who have made it their mission to fight world crime as the 'World Police'. Being a post September 11th movie the heroes go after terrorists on the look-out for weapons of mass destruction, although they generally end up doing the terrorists work for them. What makes it such a different movie, is the fact that it was created entirely with marionette puppets - strings and all, so has kind of a modern day 'Thunderbirds' feel to it.
The puppets cars and machines are modelled on the real U.S army gear, and the writers tried to create the film in a way that 'America see's the world', including places such as Panama, Paris and even including North Korea and Kim Jong II. The America theme song and similar music helps in the patriotic theme of the film.
If you check out the features on the DVD it is amazing to see how much detail and work went into the making of the movie. Stone and Parker say how they basically wanted to create a parody of the Buckheimer films, and a big action adventure. They got a couple of big names on board to help out, including the Matrix's Bill Pope (cinematographer) to help capture the action of the film. Yet they use 'puppets as a puppet' to create comedy - by playing on the jaunty movements and characteristics of the puppets. They are however, more technically advanced than 'Thunderbirds' as each puppet has hardware creating moving facial features, and dialogue and sophisticated lip syncing programming.
Trey and Parker push the movie (and the puppets) to the limit by including a raunchy sex scence and the mockery of numerous actors in the film.
Check out http://www.teamamerica.com/ to see what im talking about. It is definitely entertaining : )

Internet, Games, Entertainment and the Uber-device.

I was thinking of Lara Croft and consequently the Play Station and the I flicked over the first Bluetooth post on the Blog. That got me thinking about online gaming again.
But I’d like to turn your attention to the ultimate home Entertainment device, and generally the drive to create something that replaces your DVD, TV, computer, a sort of central HUB of the home of the future.

Play Station 3. This thing is amazing and I feel if it is integrated into the home it will be this piece of technology that impacts our life as much as the cell phone. Sony are spending huge efforts in creating a control unit for your house if you like.

Plain Games are yesterdays news. Here is the link for the specs of the PS3
http://playstation.about.com/od/ps3/a/PS3SpecsDetails_3.htm

More powerful than any modern PC with an amazing new processor that Sony nursed to life it will be great for games no doubt. However, Sony is offering the home user so much more than games.
Blue Ray DVD player, excellent.
Internet ready. Online shopping, I assume there is some allowance for browsing too.
Surround sound. Just buy your favourite brand of speakers and BOOM!!!
Bluetooth! It can talk to you Bluetooth Fridge or up to 4 BT devices I think.

Moreover, there are rumours of Sony and Apple getting together to integrate PS3 and iPod into some workable system. http://homeentertainment.engadget.com/entry/1234000020043386/

There also rumours that Sony is integrating its Location free technology into the PS3. to what effect its hard to imagine, probably that you can play your games or watch movies through the Location free monitor while running it off the Play Station.
Here is a link for the TV set itself
http://www.gizmodo.com/archives/sonys-locationfree-tv-handson-009722.php

So what do you people think? Is the technological behemoth a must in every home? Or is this going to be another flopped venture? Is Sony onto something with it’s HUB concept? Would you get one? Would you use one?

I was reading the National Geographic online the other day when an article caught my eye. It turns out that scientist in California at the institute of technology have developed the speed of internet another mile stone further. The new technology is being called FAST( Fast Active queue management Scalable Transmission). The scientist were able to achieve a speed of 8,609 mega bytes per second! That may not sound like much the average computer savvy person, but just as an example, a person could go online and download a full length DVD movie in roughly five seconds! That's incredible.

Just imagine the applications of internet moving that quickly. People could easily post entire books or volumes of books online that could be obtained in fractions of seconds. The applications to data bases are unnumbered. Scientist could trade and exchange volumes of research. Best of all though, there would be no more waiting in line to download music from the net.

As the internet has changed over the years, people continued to push it to its limits. It seems as though someone is always improving this or altering that. Extremely rapid internet is an expected change and the applications to our current model are not numbered. Internet years from now could be drastically different that we know it today. It might be more of a virtual interactive space or something that is not even imaginable now.

Whether it takes 5 hours, 5 minutes or 5 seconds to download something on the net, one thing is certain and that is it will all be just a 'click' away.

Link to National Geographic article

Thursday, August 11, 2005

ok now the time right again. odd. must've been that technical cliche

title for my previous entry: video calling

by the way did anyone else notice that the time is wrong. It says the time I submitted my entry is at 5.09pm but it is actually 5.38pm.

oh my gosh I spent half an hour typing up my entry and some technical thing happend to the computer, I thought I was the only one experiencing it but everyone else in my row is having the same problem. It is very frustrating, now I have to start all over again from memory of what I was talking about.

Yesterday I recieved a text message from Vodafone about video calling as everyone else did too. I thought since the various features of the mobile phone keeps increasingly changing why don't they also come up with a different name to call this new technology, after all it doesn't really describe a 'mobile phone'. The video calling also reminded me of 'The Simpson" the episode where a fortune teller was telling Lisa Simpson about her future. It was in that episode that I saw video calling, between Marge and Lisa. And now it is realistically available in our world. Quite fascinating.
Just last night I saw on the TV3 news about T3G. It has numberous functions like, access to the internet, video recording, video calling, texting, access to your e-mails, downloading, music and now watching T.V, your favourite television programmes, the news, sports and now even cartoons! It may all seem very fascinating and futuristic but however very costly for example, it ranges from $700 - $1000 (or just above $1000). I personally wouldn't purchase a phone that expensive. I guess this phone in particular is an entertainment tool all compacted in one.

Another thing, after I have read a few blog entries about text talk and language changing I would like to comment that text language is decreasing our knowledge in spelling words. Just the other day, I couldn't even remember how to spell a simple word, my mind felt puzzled. Has anyone else experience that yet? I think it can confuse some people when it comes to using specific words with their text language.
However, texting is fast and efficient, it enables you to communicate with another person say for last minute things, without having to directly calling them, like unable to meet up with them in the last minute (without having to feel so guilty).

Which brings me to another unrelated to phones, is that while inventors have been coming up ideas with new functions to put into cell phones why don't they come up with ideas on saving things that your typing say on this blog, incase the computer suddenly decides to blink out on you while you are in the middle of typing up your work. (I don't know if it's my fault for not saving what I'm typing at the moment in time or the fact that there should be some way of retreiving what i'm instantly typing on the internet like this blog.)

The wonderful world of cartoons and a guy called Joe...

For me, cartoons these days just dont cut it. I remember the good old days of "The Chipmunks" and "The Snorks", when the pictures were simple and the story was simple. "Hello Snork A, would you like to come play with me?" "Why yes Snork B, let us frollock in the glory of the ocean with all our other snork friends". There was the odd occassion where they would have to save the 'special' one who couldnt talk (all he did was make snork noises, almost like blowing through a straw in a glass of high quality H2O) but other than that, the stories were simple and child like. These days its all "I'm gonna go up there with my spikey hair, big muscles (because I'm a child and thats what all children have these days, BIG MUSCLES) and special laser gun, and waste the big scary half human half monster thing that is about to destroy the earth and all that lives on it! YEAH!" (note: the mouth always seems to keep moving, even after the characters finished speaking) For me, its all a little bit extreme, but perhaps its because I am so used to the goodness that was...1990.

But...at last! I have found a website that has given me hope to re-open the long lost love affair with hume...huma... humorous entertainment. And it is all thanks to a man called Joe.

Joe...joe who? Wait a minute, is it...Joe Bloggs? No. He doesnt actually tell ya what his full name is. That's ok, we forgive him. The website is www.joecartoon.com, and it is 100% goodness I tell you that!

It is based on a bunch of southern blue grass yokels from America. In this bunch of yokels are the people, who are retarded in all aspects, and the animals, who if not mouthing off and calling you all names under the sun, are being electrified in light sockets, or fried in microwaves. It sounds sick, but I think what makes these characters and their scenarios funny is their "freshness". They are fresh country yokels, always at the wrong end of the bargain.

The site gives you various cartoons to choose from, including a list of the Top 10 most popular (counted by the number of hits it gets) or a categorised section, such as the Gerbil cartoons (and I'd have to say these are the pick of the bunch). You can also download screensavers, icons, sounds and wallpapers, and they have a whole bunch of other stuff, such as comics and an online 'shop' to buy joecartoon merchandise. Good times, good times.

What else can I say about this site? I think its a great laugh, but its definetely for those who have a sense of humour. Its hard to describe what kind of 'laugh factor' it has. Some of the cartoons left me in tears, while others were just retarded (like it was missing a point, and I think that was the whole purpose, maybe I'm retarded and don't understand). Most of the cartoons miss the point anyway, in the sense that, they're completely not what you thought they were going to be, but after a few watches you get the jist of it, and come to learn that Joe..is just really bored and wants to amuse both us and himself.

So do enjoy what you watch. Its well worth a look, and let me know what you all think of it.
Happy watching!

Rebekah

Why rotten is good.

The blogg written by Mags (rotten dot com) covers many of the ideas spoken about in the lectures. Firstly the sites like www.rotten.com or steakncheese.com (which does not seem to still exist) cater to a market or niche as described. Yes the content is disturbing but the philosophy behind the internet today is the freedom to publish any information you want free of conviction, or threat from authority that would otherwise occur in a non-democratic environment. Luke described this as the "internet democracy," an environment which is free of governance, where all participants have a equal opportunity to voice opinions, publish ideas and perhaps even become part of an internet community of like minded individuals, with out the fear of pro/persecution. The only way to control the spread of these ideas, or in this case images, is by controlling access to the internet, not the internet itself. This is achieved, in most cases, by implementing programs like netnanny, or content control as discussed in the blogg by Shannon (spyware) were individual companies or organizations will monitor or 'spy on' individuals to stop certain content from being downloaded or moved through their systems. The incentive not to download the information is then the fear of loss of privileges or in some cases membership or employment. No I don'’t agree with the content on the rotten.com web site but I do agree with the ideas and lack of restrictions which make it possible for a site like this to exist. The internet should be a full democracy.

Hamish

Wednesday, August 10, 2005

“Could pornography be coming to a mobile near you?”

I have never watched Campbell Live before, but I watched it tonight for the segment about mobile phones with videos. I have personally never had the desire to own a camera phone, but am intrigued at the way improved mobile technologies are emerging (and the associated deliberations). Gone are the days when we used our mobiles solely for making calls. They are now being packed with more and more (unnecessary?) features. I question whether or not these features are providing more harm than good.

With the arrival of mobile networks like Telecom’s T3G, the application of mobile phones is expanding. However, like all technologies, video/camera phones have their problems. On Campbell Live they pointed out the issues of security, privacy, and mischievous purposes surrounding the use of these phones. In particular, they highlighted the fact that there is now a problem of pornography being downloaded from the Internet onto mobile phones. With heaps of young children now using mobile phones, this seems to be a serious problem – that such material is readily accessible. Of course, the Internet itself poses the same threat, but do we really need more sources of aquisition of inappropriate material for our youth?

I feel like the negative aspects of this particular mobile phone feature (video)outweigh the positive. It is simply too easy to discreetly take pictures/videos of unknowing people, and transmit them elsewhere. It is no surprise that PXT and video phones have been banned from certain places (changing rooms, etc.). However, I highly doubt a few rules are going to stop people from abusing this new technology.

On Campbell Live tonight they also touched on the notion of video calls being the next big thing. Well, this would be kind of cool…as long as you’re not worried about how you look. To demonstrate this, at the end of the segment, John Campbell ‘crossed live’ to a reporter in Foodtown(!!!) via a video/camera phone. Rather than a ‘video’, it was merely a slow series of poor quality still shots. Rather unimpressive really. Great idea John, but maybe you need a better phone before you venture into this new method of live reports. Although I am not personally too keen on the idea of camera phones, I really hope that this aspect is improved.

Anyway, I am quite happy with my non-camera phone for the time being. When video phones become the norm, I may have to upgrade. I just hope that porn does not infiltrate this technology the way it has on the Internet.

- Shan Doherty

empty vessels (or false ones)

It seems like Lara Croft is similar to the representation of war fare in gaming. They both posess an emptyness in terms of really representing the realities of those experiences which are being lived through in the game space. Lara allows players to navigate through the game emobodied as a woman, yet even the first lady of gaming, is not represented as truely female, but as having masculine attributes which act as the means for her empowerment. Likewise, the representation of war offers roles within the game space which push towards valour, victory, pride, logic and intelligence - and leave the elements of horror, pshycological torment, and experiences of true f$%*ed up-ness that one could only encounter when in a war for real, out of the main picutre. So both War and Woman (in these two cases specifically - Im not trying to form a rant about feminism) are mis-represented as being somthing ideal, and these ideals filter down into gaming from the powers that be, The Man, the dominant ideological forces etc etc, from those who decide (and cater to also - of course it feeds a demand) what it is the masses will idealise about and consume. How convenient that a war game idealises and makes heroic the role of the soldier in times like these, and how convenient that the first really well knowen female gaming character is one whose only femaleness are tits and arse - not reflective of current society / power relations at all ay ?? ;-) I personally dont believe that these games create a more humanitarian or ground level, eye to eye understanding for those who play, towards those who the gaming focuses on (Soldiers, Iraqi peoples, Women etc) - because the representations that are offered are false, idealistic and exculsive of key information which could have constituted room for greater understanding - and so would do more harm in terms of relations than good. This is my rant, and its only an idea - I like discussing stuff, so if you disagree feel free....etc.

Listening to digital music

Listening to digital music

Just a few personal thoughts on digital music in the afterlife of that lecture I gave last week. I didn’t really talk as much as I wanted about how the way we live with music has changed or just intensified things that were already happening in the analogue realm. Some of you have been talking about gadget fixation—not being able to leave your mobile phones at home without serious anxiety. I’m like that with my iPod. And despite having music on other formats—vinyl, cassette and CD—I’m always desperate to get more of it onto the iPod for convenience sake. It’s easier to access with a flick of the finger on the click wheel than messing about with CDs and CD players etc. I’ve got 36 gigs on it now and not much more memory left so have to start thinking about which albums and tracks to delete for now if I’m going to put more files that I’ve downloaded or copied from borrowed CDs or taken from my own CDs or records. Too many decisions to be made!

In his book Noise: The Political Economy of Music, Jacques Attali argues that once music is a commodity it enters a period of ‘repetition’ and encourages ‘stockpiling’. We want more and more because it’s easily available and the industry encourages us to want more. I’m definitely close to being a music addict because I constantly want new sources of sonic pleasure. Now some graduate students have told me that they listen to a whole bunch of MP3s on their computer database/iTunes or whatever and then dump most of them after a couple of months or so, and start with a new set of MP3s. There isn’t a need to keep things permanently. I’m older and trained in the vinyl era when the idea of the record collection was stronger and the fetishism for the recorded object was stronger. You did sift through your records and flog them to a record store or exchange them every so often but on the whole you just keep collecting and even kept the records you didn’t listen to much because you never know if something you’ve liked and then no longer liked might come back into your listening favour or into fashion. For example, all my early 80s electro tunes are now rokkin’ the house again. Do you think the consumption paradigm of us old farts from the vinyl era is gone or does it still hold true? Or is the new consumption paradigm more likely to be a combination of these two ways of buying and listening to music.

Recent surveys suggest that those who download music are actually the ones that buy more CDs too. I know that’s true for me. I’ll buy stuff that I’ve downloaded sometimes, but not all the time. It depends on the desirability of the CD itself and the inferior sound quality of the MP3, rather than any moral judgment about ripping the artist off or not. I think more music companies need to concentrate on giving added value to the CD rather as the DVD gives you ‘extra features’. Some are already doing this with their ‘enhancements’ like music videos. I would like to see those crappy and easily breakable jewel boxes replaced by more ecologically sound and durable boxes or digipacks. I also want record companies who are trying to make money off their back catalogues give you more interesting and well-researched notes and more careful thought put into the artwork for CDs. Independent labels like Warp and Ninjatune seem to do that more than big guns though. People will always like the physical object because people like things, and that commodity fetishism for the music object that you can feel and touch will remain, though it’s been somewhat displaced on to the player with the iPod.

Digital music also makes music more mobile from one platform to another. I can read about a particular track on the web or in a magazine, download it from the web, copy it onto a CD or simply plug my iPod into the mixer and console at the radio station and broadcast it to Aucklanders who are listening in. That stockpiling of music doesn’t diminish the fact that most of us who like music want to share it with other people. Friends do the same for me. Music is invariably more social than the record companies imagine it. They want you to pay for every copy out there in the world. Can you imagine if we didn’t read newspapers and magazines that other people bought? It’s unthinkable in terms of social practice. As human beings we like to share stuff. And in that regard music is like food.

What I’ve also recently noticed as I’ve downloaded music (only the last year) is that I can quickly recover old tracks that have disappeared from the shelves, discover new things that someone mentions to me or I’ve read about that haven’t appeared in the shop yet or never will, or I just come across stuff that is unexpected. For example, I’ve been listening to jazzy or funky vibraphone stuff recently, by the likes of Roy Ayers and Cal Tjader and others. While I was online I remembered that there’s a jazz musician called Milt something who recorded vibes. I couldn’t remember his last name so I just typed ‘Milt’ in the search engine. A whole bunch of artists and tracks came up, including Milt Jackson, who I was after. I downloaded a version of a song I know, ‘People make the world go around’, by him. But I also noted that there were some files of film dialogue attributed to ‘Milton’. These were the bits spoken by a character in one of my favourite films Office Space. So I downloaded these small files and I’m sure I’ll put them in a radio show or integrate them in a mix CD. I gained something unexpected from the technology.

As a mix tape and compilation CD freak, I often make CDs around topical themes that occupy me during the weeks and months. So recently as someone obsessed by the London bombings and the war on terror, I’ve just typed ‘terror’ or ‘suicide’ or ‘Baghdad’ or ‘Palestine’ or ‘London’ or ‘George W Bush’ or ‘Bin Laden’ into the search engine and yielded some unexpected gems as well as some duds. It’s a different way of finding and listening to music than trawling through the music store for hours, which still by the way, gives me regular pleasure. And it means you can juxtapose different kinds of music and not be tied to genre. I think the mixtape really kicked all this off in a big way and is one of the most important developments in popular music. People were trading them before the era of the MP3. They were personalized collections of tunes for a specific purpose—your own incipient database. Think of John Cusack in the film High Fidelity with his monologue about the careful construction of the mix tape. I think I once persuaded someone to go out with me after sending them some heartbreaking love songs. 50 Cent began his career rapping on mixtapes sold in downtown NYC. There’s a new book on the culture of the mixtape and its personalized graphics etc. edited by Thurston Moore of Sonic Youth.

The other thing worth mentioning is that music blogs have become something of a hybrid of the diary, music journalism, the radio, and even the record company with their official and unofficial MP3 files.

Even record companies are allowing you to download some artists’ music, then remix it yourself, send it back to them. The label posts the remixes for downloading and people can vote for the best one.

There are so many legal and illegal sites and MP3s, and as I said in class, the boundaries are blurred between the legit and illegit. That recent big German hit “Schnappi” has been remixed many times and you can find scores of mixes online, most of them unofficial. But these have created the ‘buzz’ that fuels consumer demand for the legit CD that you can buy in Real Groovy or The Warehouse.

Anyway, I’ve blathered on for a while, so look forward to reading about how you guys consume, or should I say, listen to music individually and collectively.

Thanks

Nabeel
n.zuberi@auckland.ac.nz

PS another plug for my radio show:

The Basement with Nick and Nabeel
Saturdays 4-6 pm
107.3 FM Auckland
www.basefm.co.nz
http://blogs.phiner.co.nz/thebasement/

Always Accessible

In response to the cell-phone at the hip blog. I was recently working at an I.T. health conference at Skycity (making coffee). The conference has all the latest business technology, instant emails, conferencing, and other business related I.T. I was surrounded by people not only talking to each other, but people talking through instant messages to Australia and people talking on walkie talkie cell-phones in the same room. All the while, because I was working I couldn’t answer my cell-phone or check my email. By the end of the day I felt a sense of happiness and not the usual anxiety. I realised this was because I hadn’t had the usual expectations of having an overload of messages through out the day, (new room allocations, changes to assignments, the latest movies or products for sale, the weather at Mt Ruapehu, friends adventures overseas and more…) I felt a sense of relief at not being bugged. The first thing I did when I got home was to check my email!! I guess what I’m trying to say is that technology is a great source of instant information, but do we need a break sometimes just to listen to ourselves and take a breath.

Before Lara


Well, after the discussion today, I couldn't resist a little tribute to WW (yes, just two W's), the pre-digital feminine 'stunt body'. Pixel perfect, she was...

Dangers of playing video games

Take a look at this news story

Didn't think it was possible to play games 50 hours non-stop.. that will teach him :p

Text talk, flirting, relationships..

Claire and Rach both made interesting points about instant messaging and text messaging abbreviations becoming part of everyday conversation. I would like to expand on this idea further and suggest that these mediums have not just abbreviated the human language but have also abbreviated human relationships as well. At the age of 27 I can remember a time before mobile phones and the convenience of sending text messages andI believe that text messaging has changed the way we interact with each other. Before messaging if you wanted to ask somebody out on a date you had to pick up a phone and call them; now you can swap numbers with someone and text flirt without the nervousness that comes with actual physical conversation or human interaction. Messaging seems to have sped up the whole process, a message can be sent stating something that the person may not have the courage to say. I know of friends who have swapped numbers, text flirted for awhile, engaged in text sex and then ended the whole "messaging affair"without ever actually meeting up with the person for a coffee! Additionally, I know of friends who have been in relationships that have ended because of the discovery of text messages or emails that have incriminated cheating partners. Finally messaging has made it easier to cancel obligations or stand up friends, back in the "old days" of home phone lines, if you made a date with someone you honoured it and always showed up on time because it was more difficult to get in contact to cancel. Now we can just send a quick impersonal message saying " Sry im l8 nt cuming k?".

Information Anxiety

If you're anything like me, your cellphone is like a part of your body. I can't go anywere without it, and I hate to admit that I am actually afraid to turn it off at night. Should I acidentally leave it at home one day, I spend the whole day in a desperate panic that someone important is trying to call, or that I'm going to miss out on some crucial infomation, gossip or invite from a friend. By leaving it on and always having it with me, I am reachable 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. I hate to be unreachable. We have a bach in the coromandel that for a long time didn't get reception, so everyday when we drove to a local town with reception I would eagerly await that familiar beep. But now that we've got reception there I no longer have to wait in frustration, I never have to worry of being unreachable.

So my obsession with always being reachable obviously entails that I check my phone constantly just in case I may have not heard it beep. Or ring. In fact, I am begginning to wonder how I ever survived without it before.

When I was 15, which by today's standards is really old, I got a cellphone 'just in case' of emergencies. Of course texting didn't exist at the time, but having the phone was a kind of priviledge, and hardly an extension of my body. I honestly can't remember how or when it went from a just-in-case-of-emergencies priviledge to a device that I feel I just can't live without.

But what I don't understand is that I know, rationally, I don't really need the phone. I actually could live without it. If I need to contact someone there are payphones, and there usually isn't something so important that I can't wait to get home to find it out. But the thought of having to wait a few hours to find out information is somewhat scary. If something happens, or someone is nearby or wants to do something, I want to know NOW. I don't want to find out after everyone else, I don't want to have to make plans in advance and then have to stick to them exactly, I want the flexibility of having a cellphone. And I want to be reachable, just in case. I've got 'information anxiety' - I can't stand to be unreachable, unavailable or unable to receive information from people, so my phone is on, 24/7 and I'm always checking it, just in case.

Sonic the Hedgehog, a part of the once-mighty Sega Gaming Corp.



Remember Sonic and Sega and SegaTV? Yes, that's right, take your mind back to the 1980s and early 1990s, and you'll remember the neat programme with the spikey-haired Hedgehog in a video game style format. Sega is still around, virtually a shadow of its former self. The web-site @ www.sega.com is interesting and interactive. It allows users to join a blog and participate in Sega.com through posting general messages and gaming tips. A comprehensive list of all the games manufactured by the company and their respective platforms is listed which includes Nintendo, XBOX, PS2 and Game Cube, not to mention a list of games available for the home PC. With a wide range of platforms and Japanese-style characters, Sega Games still look interesting, entertaining and cutting-edge. Also check out their Corporate History - very interesting. Nowadays however, Sega is owned by Nokia and Nokia uses Sega's technology for gaming on their mobile phone range. Sega.com is also owned by Nokia as a separate offshoot of Sega's online gaming.

Text talk!

Claire talks about instant messaging language taking over our everyday communication in her blog titled "Quick to say our goodbyes... quick to say it all?" I have to agree that our everyday language is changing and text messaging talk is taking over! Whether it be a huge change, or a slow progressive change, I definately believe it's happening.

I have to admit that i am a culprit for shortening my texts as much as possible, sometimes to fit more information in the text, sometimes simply as a form of laziness. The texting, and occasionally email world has become so shortened or condensed that for those who aren't used to it, it can be very daunting and in some cases seem like a foreign language!

People can get so used to this however, that it then becomes harder, and not as natural, to type an email in "proper" English. An example is from one of my papers last year, when someone handed in a short assignment that was written in text language!

Is there a line between when we shorten words and when we are to use the 'long' form? Or do the two just merge together?

I'm not sure however, if this is just a phase, or if it is in fact a transition, and what we have now is simply a 'taste' of what's to come!

Tuesday, August 09, 2005

Tim Berners-Lee on blogging etc.

A BBC interview with the man who invented the web: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4132752.stm

Quick to say our goodbyes... quick to say it all?

Just a response to the bit of discussion that we had in tutorial on Monday: instant messaging language taking over our everyday communication. Reminded me directly of a good friend I have back home who is completely guilty of this. We will be parting ways and she will shout out, “T.T.Y.L.!” It’s so customary to occur at the end of our hang-outs that I don’t even call her out on it anymore. But still, stopping to think about it I find it completely ridiculous. In a lot of instances we do seem to be progressively shortening our speech to the commonly used/typed language of IM. Friends going from saying, “I’ll see you later!” to “Later” to the simplistic and short “Late.”

Granted, much of the communication that is done while at uni, to get a hold of friends or keep in touch while they’re away, is conveniently done on the computer through instant messaging (or probably even more-so through texting). It works and is completely understood on the computer or phone, so why not integrate it in everyday person-to-person “convo” as well. Overall, today’s society seems to be aiming at the simplest way around any given obstacle. In application, even if that obstacle may merely be saying good bye to a friend. So we might just keep applying the language of IM and even texting to our everyday talk. Who knows where it will be cut-off? If at any point? You would think that there is only so far you can shorten our words and still make sense of them, or still sound anything of intellectual. We shall see if our discussions start and continue to resemble the grunts of prior cavemen or something of the like…

The New Napster?

During a management lecture last week, we were told that in no way whatsoever should anyone contemplate using the Internet to find resources for essay research. Initially I was shocked, as I have found the Internet an integral part of the research process for all my previous essays at uni. It was then explained that the problem with the Internet was that the majority of students could not tell a legitimate resource from “total crap” and it was leading to many student basing their essays on resources that were “total crap” and thus producing essays of similar nature. This is obviously an issue that arises from the nature of the net and its ability to give ‘anyone and everyone’ the power to publish their own ideas regardless of legitimacy or quality. Obviously this is an issue that will have to be tackled in the future as the Internet goes from strength to strength and becomes the center of our everyday lives. Interestingly this problem also plagues the area of file sharing programs, for which I will devote the rest of the blog.

For many, their first experience of the file-sharing world came in the form of Napster. It was the industry standard on which we could all rely, then it went legit. The market was then flooded with many programs, leaving the user to the nightmare of wading through the sea of lackluster programs to find the best. Nabeel mentioned in his lecture on music that his file sharing program of choice was Limewire, and this seems to be the closest to winning the spot of the true 'Napster predecessor’. I have been through the trials and tribulations of using programs such as Kazaa, Morpheus and BearShare, but Limewire comes out the clear winner for various reasons. Firstly it includes no spyware or adware at all. A natural positive side effect of this is that as the Limewire.com website claims it's "the fastest file sharing program on the planet' for the very reason that it doesn't have all the extra baggage (adware and spyware) to slow it down. More importantly corrupt files are virtually non-existent on Limewire. Meaning that your time can be efficiently used actually downloading files rather than having to hunt down a clean file among the sea of corrupt ones, which seem to have been flooded onto the other networks by the recording industry. All in all, an ‘absolutely fantastic’ program. For the budget conscious the free version does the job fine
(http://www.limewire.com/english/content/download.shtml) or if you want some extra features shelling out $18.88 US will get you the more advanced ‘Limewire Pro’.

btw. If you feel that you would like the extra features but your wallet says no, there's an easy way to get round this. Download the free version, run it and do a program search for 'Limewire'. Up will pop a list of the LimewirePro install program on the hard drives of other uses that have paid for it, download one of these, uninstall the free version and install the pro version, and your away! - All the added benefits without the cost. If your feeling bad about ripping off Limewire, here’s a little ‘food for thought’. In effect all you are doing is ripping off an organization that makes a living out of helping others rip off the film, television and music industries! Not so bad after all.

Happy sharing,

Alisdair Hungerford-Morgan

America's Army


Was reading this months issue of Cosmos and saw something on America's Army, seeing that this weeks lecture is on video games i thought i might as well mention it on here. Anyway the game has been created by the U.S.Army in order to recruit people, you can download it for free from the homepage. Just thought it was interesting that the army was using computer games as a method to recruit people, and the possible implications of the game itself, for example soldiers treating real life warfare like a game, or being unable to distinguish between the differences of virtual warfare and real life warfare. You don't get to reload if you die out in Iraq.

GPS

I haven't had too much time to look online lately, but the one thing that I have got to fiddle with is the Global Positioning System that's in my mom's car. It was developed by the US military, and basically uses a satellite network system to pinpoint the location of a person (or a car) and also an accurate time anywhere on the Earth, with the use of a GPS receiver. It can be used by anyone, anywhere, for no cost. If you want to read more about the technical stuff (of which I am a little confused myself), here is a helpful website... http://explanation-guide.info/meaning/Global-Positioning-System.html

In our car its called the In-Nav system. After putting a disc which contains information about the place you're in (we have one for the North Island at the moment), the user is given many options on the main screen: Navigation, Entertainment, Communication, and Service, and you move through options using a controller which is almost like a mouse on any computer. If you choose Navigation you can choose your destination from a list of street names, or you can also access an information section in which you can find malls, cinemas, parks, etc... As you drive, the GPS will direct you through a voice (you choose whether female or male) as well as on the screen. You can also load the map to aid you, or you can shut the screen off in case it distracts you. You will be warned of any big intersections in advance. Of course it is a big problem when the roads are temporarily closed for work, as of course the sattelite doesn't see through that bit.

The entertainment option allows you too choose whether you want to listen to CD's or FM. Its pretty much the same as any car player, except through the computer. For communication you can use Bluetooth and connect your phone. The service option tells you when you next service date is and lists the BMW number. There is also an "i" which gives you options for the car. You can see if everything is functioning properly in your car including your brakes, or how much gas you have. You can also put in a speed limit at which the car will beep in order to warn you not to go above the limit.

Its not that complicated a system to use, and its also like any computer. What fascinates me, and in a way scares me, is that the car is handled by a computer rather than a person. It mainly scares me because it decides to malfunction the moment you need it the most (just like my faithful laptop does!!!!). We went to Bucklands Beach one night using the GPS and had never been there before. As soon as we put on the car on our way back, the GPS screen showed us as in the sea. We tried to input an address, but she started to guide us on non-existent roads. In the end we had to pull out our trusty old mapbook to guide us back home (and we actually made it!). The problem with programs and other things such as the GPS is that we become dependent on them, and then have the hardest time when things malfunction. Of course other disadvantages of the system can be that the US government has control over us, and if they ever decide to shut the sattelite off in case of war, the people who are dependent will suffer. This is perhaps why other countries are thinking of launching their own sattelites, such as Europe.

All in all, the GPS does make life much easier. I just wonder how long it will be before we actually don't need to drive our cars at all, but just sit along for the ride.

Abandonware


Remember all those neat games you used to play as a kid? Sure the graphics weren't fantastic but they were entertaining anyway. Many people probably have no interest in old games because new games are becoming so advanced. For those of you who enjoy old games and haven't already discovered abandonware head over to The UnderDogs it's a great site filled with old school games.
There's a wonderful little legal loophole about abandonware, it sort of sits in a grey area to my knowledge. If a company no longer produces a title for sale it basically becomes free game, no-ones complaining if you spread copies. In a time when there is such controversy over piracy it's an interesting that there is this little loophole. There are numerous sites out there on the net dedicated to abandonware but I've found Underdogs one of the best, everything is organised into categories and there are even recommendations, help files and forums for gamers.
It's interesting to see the community that has grown around these games and despite the demise of DOS in XP (evil evil XP) people are still working around it to play old games.
Underdogs is a fantastic archive of old games, I feel it says something for the way games used to be made that there are archives where people are still downloading and actively playing games that are now so old, obviously graphics are not everything. So despite the ever increasing market and advancement of gaming consoles some people still go back to the basics.

Chinese Searching Engine Is Becoming An Appetizing Cake In World Stock Market

Chinese searching engine is becoming an appetizing cake in world stock market. Last week, the biggest Chinese searching engine in the world ( Baidu. Com Inc. ) had succeeded in landing onto Nasdaq which is one of extremely influential stock market in America. In the first day, its price of stock was increased up to 122.54 USD per share but the emitting price is just 35 USD. Due to the incredible soar of price, there are nearly 200 staffs who work for Baidu becoming millionaires.

As we know, Google has a hegemonic status in the web searching engine market, but why Baidu can become a new appetizing cake which is pursued crazily by shareholder? In my mind, Chinese searching engines became a new highlight because they have their own cultural advantage comparing to western searching engines. Western searching engines are rather powerful when users search some contents which are related to western culture. However, they are getting clumsy when we search some contents which are closely related to exotic culture such as Asian culture. On the other hand, Chinese searching engines have a huge advantage over the western searching engines in searching those contents which is related to Chinese culture.

I did an interesting experiment to support my viewpoint. When I searched “Hayley Dee Westenra” in both Google (www. google. co. nz ) and Baidu, I got 3620 entries in Google but only 95 in Baidu. However, when I searched “ the great wall” in them, I got 31,000,000 entries from Google but more than 50,000,000 from Baidu. Therefore, I think Google and Baidu have different searching advantages in different areas.

If you are interested in Chinese culture, "www. baidu.com" is a good searching engine for you.

The new domestic commodity?

Hey all! Hope you are all enjoying your semester (even though it's the cold one).

Last week in FTVMS 211 (Watching TV) we had a lecture about television being the domestic commodity. It started out as a family thing - the central point of attention in anyones living room. It has now become more individualised, in that we have our own TV's in our bedrooms etc. I was thinking that in someways the home PC has replaced TV as the major domestic object in the average household. I know since we invested in broadband internet at home, I very rarely watch TV and spend most of the 'primetime' hours on my computer.

I have a friend who's parents are extremely 'tech-savvy' and have three computers and a XBox all networked together. They constantly are downloading movies and music. When a movie is downloaded they can send it from one of the PC's to the XBox and watch it through their big screen TV. So although they are sitting in front of a television, what they are watching is from a computer.

In the last few years PC manufacturers have tried to push the 'media-PC' which is basically a PC, TV-tuner, hard-drive recorder, and stereo system in one. These have not taken off, possibly because people like to have their TV and PC in seperate rooms. Or because we would just rather have seperate devices for all those things. Personally I can't see myself sitting on my couch typing my assignments, or watching a movie on an uncomfortable computer chair.

So, is the home PC going to be the new number one domestic commodity? I think it probably will. And I think we should all have a laugh at Mr Hewlett Packard for scoffing the idea (see- Pirates of Silicon Valley). Let me know what you think!

Monday, August 08, 2005

rotten dot com

WARNING: seriously, don't follow the link below unless you're certain you won't be disturbed.

A couple of years ago a friend of mine directed me to www.rotten.com - Even though Im sure the majority of you have already heard of it, for those who havnt, just be careful going to and searching through the sight if you are easily frightened by images of death and gore and the like.
I was horrified when I first came across this site. I looked at it a few times with a morbid curiosity and found that the images really stayed with me, even when I slept they would crop up in my minds eye - I guess we dont deal with such extreme images on a daily basis and so our subconciouse hangs onto them, or is shocked by them and trying to deal with them - or whatever bla bla. and so I havnt visited it again since. But it is a pretty awesome representation of the freedom of the net, and the way that it has allowed for the true desires of people to be catered to. Its so true that when passing a crash scene, our natural curiosity to see gore kicks in and we really want to slow down and gawk, and as hideous a characteristic as this is - its the truth and is represented in the content of rotten.com.
Its pretty hard core, and taboo in many ways as it deals with the face of death which the general media are not allowed to show (id bet they would if they could), but aside from that it is very real and shows that people DO want to see what death looks like. It also shows that people just like disgusting things, as not all the images are of death and gore - but of weird stuff things which just make you think 'what the.....' and 'why the......' . worth a look if you can handle the jandal. I guess many people would hold differing moral stances against sites such as rotten.com and sites where you can witness things such as the death of Kenneth biggley, the brittish journalist. There is a fine line I suppose- but its amazing that there is this medium which just lets it all hang out.

Weebl

Hey all, I was trying to think of a topic for my first post and was thinking back over the lectures when I remembered Home Star Runner( a favourite of mine, especially Team Girl Squad) and this made me remember Weebl and Bob, a site that had somewhat of a cult status amongst my friends at high school. For those that don't know it http://www.weebl.jolt.co.uk/, is a site that features, through Short Flash animation, Weebl, a weird egg type guy, and his friend Bob (another smaller egg) who are obsessed with pie, and their adventures with a whole host of other characters, such as some rioting jams, to give you an example of the humour. However what fascinates me just as much as these crazy characters, is how websites like this build up fan bases that in turn build up more websites. I mean, when I was googling Weebl I found websites that let you take a quiz to find out which Weebl character you are most like. Another site let you download Weebl ringtones which I didn't even know existed. I guess it's just an example of the diversity and usability of the Internet that allows almost everyone to have a part. For now though if you like this sort of thing, I suggest you check out the latest animation Piepod, a pisstake of the iPod ads, yet this time with Apple Piepods.

Who will be my current affairs eye candy now? The Holmes show has been dropped!

This morning it was announced that Paul Holmes and his show Holmes has been dropped from the T.V station Prime.
On it's first airing, the show held 12% of the viewing share*. But then ratings kept plunging lower and lower, much like J-lo's next neckline, until Prime scraped the show. It's main downfall has been put down to viewing routines. That people are creatures of habit, one of which is to sit and watch the news on television at 6, and if time allows, watch a current affairs show at 7. For many years, the news have had two key channels to choose from - tvone, and tvthree. Holmes was a current affairs show, held at 6. It was on the station Prime, which you have to programe in to view. My Gran adores Holmes, but didn't programme prime into her television. Alot of older people do like Holmes, but not all have easy access to prime. This would have resulted in a decrease of dedicated viewers. But of course, the publicists haven't said Paul Holmes himself, was was a major part of the downfall.

Personally, I've never been a big fan of Paul Holmes. Honestly, I thought he was/is an annoying little man with disolusions of grandeur. I'm gonna say that as he aged, he grew out of touch with younger audiences. My Gran loves him, I know others that like him. Hey, maybe you are a fan of him yourself. Although I didn't see any of his shows on Prime television, I did frequently see him when he had his other slot. After a while, his "I know all" attitude got to me, as well annoying traits he had. After a while, I couldn't watch it anymore, he used to get over dramatic and I felt he lost the plot.
Interestingly enough, google.co.nz agrees with my theory. I have a game I play when bored/procrastinating on schoolwork, where I type in a phrase along with the word celebrity. Researching this story, just a few minutes ago (see, I get bored researching the guy let alone dedicating my viewing on him) I played the game. And I'm not kidding, the first nz site result from a search of "lost the plot" + celebrity...featured Holmes.

But of course there was a time, when Holmes was very very powerful, and held a good proportion of the viewing audience share. I guess this shows that as with anything to do with media, things can change. There are so many other ways to get infomation on current affairs. Along with both tvone and tvthree having shows, you can now to go the internet. You can go to reliable news and current affairs based blog communities like publicaddress.net whenever you want as opposed to making way in your day to watch a tv show.

Interesting reading about the show is this, from the new zealand herald, February this year. From day three it appears the holmes show looked doomed.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/index.cfm?c_id=1&ObjectID=10010611
*sourced from the above web address

Although his TV job has been scrapped, he still has his morning slot on NewstalkZB. This year he won the catagory of Best Individual or Team Talk Host or Interviewer – All Markets. So all is not doom and gloom for Holmes. Feel free to discuss this, especially if you are a Holmes fan. Remember that my opinions on him are not shared by everybody so don't get too offended.

Oh, and by the way. I was kidding about Holmes being eye candy. It's hard to express joking around tones on the internet.

GOOGLE EARTH



Maybe some of you have already explored this, however i will share, as it is one crazy piece of work. As the creators put it 'Google Earth' puts a planet's worth of imagery and other geographic information right on your desktop...... View exotic locales like Maui and Paris as well as points of interest such as local restaurants, hospitals, schools'.....the list goes on. It is also a fantastic space for procrastination when essays are due and tests are waiting to be studied for! At $400 purchase cost it will damage our poor students pockets however there is a free version to download, and i recommend it. Spend a few Sunday afternoon hours here and you will feel instantly better traveled!

Google Earth essentially allows you to view global imagery at the click of your mouse. By typing in the address or location of your house, or any location in the world, you can view a satellite photograph so detailed you could possibly see your car parked on the road. Crazy. Watch the 3D interaction navigation and it feels like you are gliding over cities, tilting the images in a realistic perspective. Along with the detailed satellite images, you can pan and zoom, mark locations, and activate layers that show points of interests like banks, schools, restaurants shopping areas and heeeaapppss more....so if your in New York City and want to find the nearest hostel or McD's the find is only a quick log on to Google Earth and there you go. I think the days of conventional maps are dwindling.

Of course the big US of A is covered with mostly high resolution images...strangely 'area 51' is slightly hazy...where as parts of south america ( my next holiday destination!!!) are less detailed. Suprisingly Takapuna is pretty well detailed. A downfall, which im sure is on the agenda to change is that images are not captured in real time, but captured by satellite images taken over the past 3 years, so it's not quite 100% accurate....

Another downfall is that Google Earth will not run on all systems. If you are running on an older computer or notebook it may have complications. Having a good internet connection is also a good idea. As of yet Google Earth does not run on Mac systems ...(why!!???)...all in good time i guess.

However Google Earth is a fantastic source for obtaining driving directions, for planning a trip, finding a location and exploring the world. Just the sight of the clear blue waters of the Bahamas, the Pyramids in Egypt or the Coloseum on your desktop is an experinace in itself.

Just about anyone in the world can explore our planet through Google Earth. Finding distances between A to B, observing natural geographic features and man-made developments, capturing high resolution images and terrain data, is a simple process for anyone using the programme whether it be for recreational purposes, commercial purposes, and it has to said, for purposes less utopian than we may be wanting to beleive. The phenomenon that it Globalisation has made creations like Google Earth possible. As Globalisation is making the world a smaller, closer space, this type of potentially harmful information is being made easier and easier to fall into the hands of the wrong people, leading to devestating effects. Although i am loving Google Earth right now, i am postivie it has the potential to play a role in this....

Jules

http://earth.google.com/

Subliminal Messages?

Towards the end of the 1st semester of 2005, I was drawn in to take a look at a very interesting email sent by a mate of mine, it had a hyper-link to a website www.subliminalmessages.com and consisted of very interesting and great use of psycological and technological effects. The website of course persisted on testing our brain capacity on still images that were also moving (huh?), exactly. For anyone who took Psyc 109 or 108 (I forget which paper it was) you would of seen some of the images that the lecturer tried and amazed us with, the the grey smuge? but if you look hard enough a different colour came up, I think it was green. However the website doesn't just consist of still images testing our mind, there are also short video-clips that also make great psycological effects, but also have great twist with the use of camera angles and when combined are quite funny (I recommend the steering wheel with the old lady). The only real downside to this website is that you can't choose your image or video-clip you simply have to keep clicking the next button, this can sometimes take a while especially if your computer is slow (like mine). However there are many images and video-clips to get you occupied with amazement and awww?

Sunday, August 07, 2005

Technology means waking up can be more fun!

Hey I thought this was interesting….Even alarm clocks are getting more advanced. If you’re anything like me ( a big sleeper) you may wanna check this out.
An article on the New York Times website- www.nytimes.com/2005/08/03/technology/techspecial3/03berger.html
caught my interest in how everyday things are getting more advanced to suit trends and lifestyles. Phillips, American Innovative and iHome have all made digital alarm clocks that make waking up in the morning more fun.
Phillips Shoqbox uses a flash-memory chip that stores your favorite songs in MP3 or WMA, so that you can wake up to music you like, rather than radio ads or an annoying buzzer. If you do want the radio, you can preset up to 10 radio stations. You can also hook up an iPod or CD player into it.
iHome’s iH5 also wake you up with your favourite songs. You hook your iPod into it, enabling you to wake up to songs on your iPod. See www.ihomeaudio.com.
American Innovative’s Neverlate is a seven-day alarm clock which lets you set a different waking time for each day of the week, so you don’t need to reset your alarm clock everyday. You can’t wake up to your favorite tunes tho, but the clock does feature snooze, sleep and nap timers which you can set. Check out: www.americaninnovative.com
I guess these new alarm clocks are an example of something you don’t really need, as you could spend a lot less money on an average alarm clock, but you may buy one because it makes your life easier and little bit more pleasant. They make ordinary alarm clocks seem dull and old fashioned.

spyware

I was reading an article in New Woman magazine called “Who’s really reading your emails?” and was shocked to find out just how easy it is for privacy to be invaded over the Internet. The article stated that as long as you use “a network, a server, company email or the Internet, then someone can read your emails”. And in fact, a number of people have been fired from their jobs for sending “inappropriate” emails. Inappropriate in this context has meant anything from emails with racist or sexist content to those that contained rude comments about employers. Passwords and log on names pose no threat to IT specialists that choose to invade personal privacy and in most cases, this type of monitoring of online activities is not even illegal. Employers use Spyware primarily to ensure that their employees are not wasting company resources or performing activities that could cause the company to suffer financially or harm the company’s reputation. Spyware picks out the racist, sexist or pornographic content in employees’ emails and other Internet activities but can also just as easily pick out anything else that employers might be interested in. Although one might find it quite appropriate for someone to be fired for downloading porn at work it might be considered quite unfair for someone to be fired for mocking an employer (obviously without intending for him to find out). But still…it happens.
And as this is exactly the kind of system we use here at university; networks, servers and the Internet, it’s kind of scary to think of who could be tracking your online activities…if they really wanted to.

-Shannon

I'm reading it.

I’ve been searching and thinking about this guy since the day watching his SOFT CINEMA. Lev Manovich, the leader of the Soft Cinema project and the videographer, editor, and author of Mission to Earth, is an internationally recognized leader in the field of new media culture. He is the author of The Language of New Media which is hailed as "the most suggestive and broad ranging media history since Marshall McLuhan." In 1994 he created Little Movies (1994), the first film project created specifically for the World Wide Web. His computer-driven installations and films have been exhibited in numerous museums, galleries, media and film festivals in the US, Europe and Asia.
Lev Manovich's work on the "language of new media" provides valuable ways for looking at new media from the point of view of structure rather than cultural content. While reading the book I feel the truth of “the normative cinema of my time feels nostalgic”.
One of Manovich's key ideas is that the emphasis on the database within digital media is what distinguishes it from older media (film literature), which emphasize narrative sequence: “After the novel, and subsequently cinema, privileged narrative as the key form of cultural expression of the modern age, the computer age introduces its correlate—the database. Many new media objects...are collections of individual items, with every item possessing the same significance as every other” (Language of New Media, 218).
He questioned the concept of Interactivity and the claim that a user of an interactive program or website becomes its co-author: that by choosing a unique path through the elements of a work, she/he supposedly creates a new work.
Manovich also points out - it is also possible to see the same process in a different way. If, as it is in most cases, a complete work is a sum of all possible paths through its elements, then the user following a particular path (which the user herself choose) only accesses a part of this whole. In other words, the user is only activating a part of the total work that already exists.

( more entries are coming as I carry on reading this book=))

The (Capitalistic) Times, They Are A-Changing


Who remembers the hey days of the 1980's when Michael Douglas in "Wall Street" coined the phrase "Greed is good" and everyone, white-collar or blue-collar was dabbling on the stockmarket. Pre 1987 greed was rife and everyone seemed to be on the phone with their broker shouting "sell" or "buy" just to be 'overheard' by others.

I was too young to be investing then and by the mid 90's, when I started investing in the sharemarket, the 1987 crash was still in memory but "mum and dad" investors started to come back to the market, still licking their wounds but determined to get back some of their money which they lost.

I remember opening up my first account with Merryl Lynch, a behemoth of a broking house, and I got assigned a stockbroker, a man with a voice which would make John Wayne blush. At that time I had to call him, or in some instances received a call, to make a trade. Trade commissions were a minimum of $50/trade or 0.75% which ever was higher. It was intimidating and I constantly felt like a small fish in a big pond when I only made trades totalling less than $2,500 which were the norm for me. I also was only able to trade the New Zealand market as commissions for overseas trades were astronomically high and for trades under $3000 I would have to make 15% on the shareprice to just break even.

When the Internet started to infiltrate more and more households, Online brokers started up and caught my eye. The cheapest at that time was the now defunct DF Mainland who offered trades for a minimum of $20 or 0.5%. Trades were executed sometimes within 2-3 minutes of placing it online, company news were e-mailed as they become available and charts were updated overnight. And most importantly, prices were "real-time" and not the usual 20 minutes delay you got from free websites. However, there was no broker advise. Needless to say that I closed my account with Merryl Lynch and my trading success was completely in my hands.

Now I trade with Directbroking. Fees are still reasonable $29 for trades under $25,000. I can also invest in the Australian Sharemarket with up to date information from the Australian Stock Exchange. Money not invested is kept in a call account earning interest above banking rates but funds can be transferred at no cost.

But most importantly the internet enables me to invest in the American Sharemarkets at an even cheaper rate and for a better service than I can receive here in New Zealand. I trade with Ameritrade arguably the biggest online sharebroker in the US. Given, I still pay top dollars on bank fees for transferring money from New Zealand to my US call account but trades are executed within seconds of the 'confirm' button being clicked and cost US$10.99/trade. The amount of company information available online is amazing. E.g. on Yahoo Finance I can access ratios, charts, company news, broker reseach, messageboards, competitor analysis and much more.

Online share investing is not for the faint hearted. The mistakes I made are plenty and I'm still recuperating losses when the dot.com bubble burst but now I have a strategy which suits me and gone are the days when I traded rather than invested. It is also important to properly monitor your portfolio with programmes like Microsoft Money and to remember the golden rule of investing "If in doubt, stay out!"

I'm lovin' it !



Every Monday night 8:30 on TV2, there is an absolutely hilarious TV drama called Desperate Housewives. The first episode was on air on 3rd of October in 2004 in America and it reached the top TV drama show during the first season. This show has been broadcasting in many other countries also New Zealand too.

The story starts from Mary Alice Young (Brenda Strong)’s death. Her 4 friends gathered for Mary’s funeral, and found a note, which had been sent to Mary. This note takes them to reveal the secret of Mary and to think about their own privacy lives of Wisteria Lane.

The techno culture has been developed so we can find lot of information from the website as well. If I miss the episode of Desperate Housewives, I can find the story of episode from the
TV2 website and further information so far (gallery, download screen saver, cast, etc). Also there are many other websites made by individual users.

I think this show is a bit similar to Sex and the City which was really famous HBO’s TV show last decade, but compare to Sex and the City, Desperate Housewives has 4 married women, and the setting is not the city, it’s suburb. Everyone has his or her secrets that do not want to show anybody, this show describes this secret as dirty laundry. As people’s delicate shades of psychology, audiences want to find out characters’ behind stories. I’m looking forward to seeing next episode ASAP!!